Another occasion arose recently, one which relates to the teaching of Film Art: An Introduction. Our definitions of the terms go like this.
Wieland Schönfelder at A Certain Lack of Coherence
This can be termed mental subjectivity. We then go on to give a few examples. They may oscillate between perceptual and mental representations and events. They need to start with simple examples to familiarize themselves with the basic distinction before going on to what the likes of Resnais, Fellini, and Mizoguchi can throw at them. But some students immediately proffering exceptions. Looking over the one and a half pages of the textbook that we devoted to depth of narration, you might find it fairly straightforward. Once you start looking for ways to teach the concepts without bogging down in too many nuances and subcategories, though, the passage does seem challenging.
What follows is a suggestion about how someone might go about explaining and utilizing examples. It also points up some ways we might revise this passage of the book for its next edition. Again, best to scotch that notion up front. Those techniques are projected outward from the character, and we observe them.
by Aschenbrenner, L
Cinematic subjectivity goes inward. Another distinction to stress early on is the basic one we make between film technique and function. There are a myriad of film techniques that could be used in either objective or subjective ways. In contrast, indicating perceptual and mental subjectivity are two specific kinds of functions.
Filmmakers can call upon whatever cinematic techniques they choose, and historically the more imaginative ones have shown immense creativity in trying to convey what characters see and think. Some films depend heavily upon subjectivity, but objective narration is more common. Most films use subjectivity sparingly. With that out of the way, we can go back to basics. Perceptual subjectivity is fairly simple.
Other characters present in the scene could step into the same vantage point and observe the same things. So the test could run like this: As a viewer, when we see something in a film, is it really present within the scene?
Could someone else in the same position see and hear the same things? Or is it a purely mental event, something no one else could see and hear, even if they stood beside the character or stepped into the place where that character had been standing?
If I were teaching the concept of narrational subjectivity as Film Art defines it, I would stress the notion of a continuum. After starting with very clear examples of both perceptual and mental subjectivity, I would progress to more ambiguous, mixed, or tricky instances. Contributing to this discussion on the Filmies list, Chris Sieving, of the University of Georgia, says he shows a clip from Lady in the Lake , the film noir where the camera always shows the POV of the detective protagonist.
One could show several minutes from any section of the film and make the point thoroughly. There are other films that contain a lot of POV shots but intersperse them with objective ones. Rear Window is an obvious case. When Jefferies is alone, we see the courtyard events from his POV, a fact which is stressed by his use of binoculars and his long camera lenses to spy on his neighbors. This is clearly perceptual rather than mental. For one thing, there are two other characters who visit at intervals and see the same things that he does.
Only if we saw something like his fantasy of how he imagines his neighbor might have killed his wife would we move into the mental realm. These two films foreground their use of POV. Usually, though POV shots are slipped into the flow of the action smoothly. Scenes of characters looking at small objects or reading letters often cut to a POV shot to help us get a look at an important plot element. The Silence of the Lambs uses many POV shots and provides an excellent case of narration switching frequently and seamlessly between objective and subjective.
The first view of Lecter is a handheld tracking shot clearly established as what she sees as she walks along the corridor in front of the row of cells. In Film Art , we use this device as an example of how style can shape the narrative progression of a scene [p. Other characters have POV shots as well, most noticeably, when Buffalo Bill twice dons night-vision goggles and we briefly see the world as he does.
Here we find a clear-cut use of mental subjectivity for fantasies, hallucinations, and the like. After an image of him thinking there is a dissolve to a view of a large, pillared house. Later, when he arrives at his small, ramshackle house, he stands staring in a similar situation, and here there is a fade-out to his dream house, which abruptly blows up. Whole films can be built around fantasies. Once students have grasped the basic distinction between perceptual and mental subjectivity, it might be useful to emphasize the continuum by moving directly to its center, where the two types coexist.
Right in the middle of the continuum between the pure cases we find ambiguous cases.
- Coherence in Composition;
- Coherence in Composition.
- Biblical Interpretation: A Roadmap: A Road Map.
- The Light Bringer.
One was a genre picture, the other a controversial art film. In several scenes, a new governess at a country estate sees frightening figures whom she takes to be ghosts haunting the two children entrusted to her.http://www.anastasiavolkhovskaya.com/wp-includes/applications/xegu-poznakomlyus-dlya.php
Art Term: Coherence
We see these figures as she does, but we never see them except when she does. The children behave very oddly in ways that might be consistent with her belief, yet they deny seeing any ghosts. Finally the governess tries to force the little girl to admit that she also sees the silent female figure standing in the reeds across the water.
From the first appearance of the eery figures, the question arises as to whether the governess is imagining the ghosts or they are real, controlling the children, who try to keep them secret.
COHERENCE | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary
There are apparent clues for either answer. Conscripto Col.
- Coherence | the living handbook of narratology?
- Coherence in multimodal arts installations | Birgit Huemer?
- Boomer & Me: A memoir of motherhood, and Asperger’s.
- Is the Christian Salvation Conditional?;
- Coherence in Visual Art.
Lomas De Sotelo, Mexico D. Friend's Email Address. Your Name. Your Email Address. Alessandro Pessoli at Marc Foxx For a section focused on performance, there were a surprising number of galleries showing painting. Debora Delmar Corp. Share this Article Like this article? Email it to a friend! Coherence is directly increased by the amount of guidance a writer provides to the reader, either through context clues or through direct use of transitional phrases to direct the reader through an argument or narrative. Word choice and sentence and paragraph structure influence the coherence of a written or spoken piece, but cultural knowledge, or understanding of the processes and natural orders on the local and global levels, can also serve as cohesive elements of writing.
It is important in composition to maintain the coherence of a piece by leading the reader or listener through the narrative or process by providing cohesive elements to the form. Thomas S. Kane describes this cohesive element as "flow" in "The New Oxford Guide to Writing," wherein these "invisible links which bind the sentences of a paragraph can be established in two basic ways.